I know of the cat/dog food companies like Iams, Eukanuba, Purina that treat roughly animals for experiments. But is it bad to purchase adjectives products from P & G, which manufactures these brands? If it is, it's kinda not easy to avoid them... there are so heaps.
Answers:
If you're asking this because you are an ethical vegetarian or lacto-vegetarian, then I would right to be heard you should avoid buying products from Proctor and Gamble. The do test on animals, not one and only their pet food, but their household products too. Yes, it can seem similar to they make only just about everything on the grocery store shelves, but it's not strong to avoid their products, if you look for the alternatives.
I want you to supply proof that Proctor & Gamble is abusing animals for it's cat and dog food products.
You can't generate a statement like that and furnish no proof. Where are the pictures? The eye witness statements? The articles within prominent newspapers exposing the treat roughly?
As it stands you have disappeared yourself wide initiate to a lawsuit from Proctor & Gamble for defamation. You bet they vigilance that you are making libelous statements on this forum where millions of relations can see it.
There are all natural, all inbred pet foods out there. I would hold to believe they do not abuse animals. They are more expensive, but if you effort about that sort of entity, it is not outlandish.
Since I originally thought this would be a question in the order of Procter and Gamble and Satanism question, I submission the link referenced below. It doesn't answer your interrogate, but it is an interesting read...
They test on animals. Peta.com have a list of companies that don't assessment on animals if you want an alternative.
More Questions & Answers...
Answers:
If you're asking this because you are an ethical vegetarian or lacto-vegetarian, then I would right to be heard you should avoid buying products from Proctor and Gamble. The do test on animals, not one and only their pet food, but their household products too. Yes, it can seem similar to they make only just about everything on the grocery store shelves, but it's not strong to avoid their products, if you look for the alternatives.
I want you to supply proof that Proctor & Gamble is abusing animals for it's cat and dog food products.
You can't generate a statement like that and furnish no proof. Where are the pictures? The eye witness statements? The articles within prominent newspapers exposing the treat roughly?
As it stands you have disappeared yourself wide initiate to a lawsuit from Proctor & Gamble for defamation. You bet they vigilance that you are making libelous statements on this forum where millions of relations can see it.
There are all natural, all inbred pet foods out there. I would hold to believe they do not abuse animals. They are more expensive, but if you effort about that sort of entity, it is not outlandish.
Since I originally thought this would be a question in the order of Procter and Gamble and Satanism question, I submission the link referenced below. It doesn't answer your interrogate, but it is an interesting read...
They test on animals. Peta.com have a list of companies that don't assessment on animals if you want an alternative.
More Questions & Answers...