would you eat to survive or stand by your morals and starve?
i'd proberly arrest & eat the fish.
Answers:
That's a darn perfect question.
Seriously, I reflect it's a great pity, or perhaps in reality a crime, that our society is so rich that some of its members have a feeling they can allow temselves the luxury of of having moral ambience about what they guzzle. Too many of the world's relatives are really on that island only within isn't any fish either..
bass
hmmmm....?errrrrrrrr?wow! that's easier said than done to say!! oh..okay,what the hell LET'S EAT!
a lot of veggies actualy put away fish!
They'd eat leaves and sand I suppose:(
Hey presently, I'm a vegan, beside the exception of beef. I would definatly say no to the fish. I deliberate it would be immoral.
Not adjectives veg'ies refuse to guzzle fish. however you forgot to mention the vegitation. Veg'ies and vegans as well as Normal Healthy Diet eater could also chomp through roots, shrubs etc..
You would have to guzzle it to survive, dont think you would stop it and kill it within the first place if you had no intention of drinking it. People do anything to survive, weve all group storys of humans eating respectively other and drinking urine to survive, so im sure you could manage the uncommon fish to survive..
no i would eat my arms consequently legs,then your cranium.
That's like asking if you be stuck in prison for existence would you become sexually involved with relations of your same sex?
What purpose do people's random opinion provide to your hypothetical question? Life isn't hypothetical..so don't try it.
Show me an island that have no plant life on it and we >may< verbs this conversation.
I don't think it's possible for an island to hold no plant life. Anyway if here really was such a hypothetical island, even if I be to catch fish, I will still die since we can't survive on fish alone: so it's die very soon or die later. I a bit focus my energies on how to get out of that island.
too unpromising dude, but I'm a vegetarian who does guzzle fish and haven't gone vegan however. still, i always said that if i have to spear my own fish/slaughter my own chicken i would just starve, so i would in recent times commit suicide at that point. i probably would die anyways from not preparing the fish right.
Well, we know that humans are not carnivores but that at times our early ancestors probably did rely on flesh when their survival depended on it (although they would not hold tried to subsist on flesh or animal products all the time because that unnatural diet for an herbivore would mete out disease...um, like we own prevalent today!). So, yes, most people would consume flesh to some extent than die. This does not compromise morals. Eating to survive does not equate to the uneccessary and unhealthy flesh consumption that goes on surrounded by today's world.
This is the kind of request for information schoolkids ask.I am never going to be in this situation!If you insist I answer though:
If near was no fresh marine eating fish wouldn't minister to and I'd die anyway.If there be fresh water consequently odds are at hand would be edible plants to get through.Either way I'd depart the fish alone.
Oh and if we did end up within this situation you wouldn't last much longer than me-you can't survive for long on nil but fish,there are profoundly of nutrients that aren't in fish.
I would chomp through it but at least take out it humanely!
I am pescaterian, meaning lacto-vegetarian but I eat fish, so yeah! I would much prefer if I could capture my own fish. I figure the root of this put somebody through the mill has to do near morals as to how deep vegetarianism surrounded by people go. my diet is chosen due to my belief that it is the healthiest for me, no impositions on others. A big section of my diet choices have to do near eating as localy as possible, and catching your own fish can't procure more local! And the fish were completely free, ingestion their natural diet, not feed who knows what on a fruit farm, which is even better.
Starve. God would give me bread to guzzle and water to drink.
how can one drink fish in desert,their is no river to drink in desert and you are dictum to eat fish.haha :)
i will die but not get through non-veg,will drink water and survive if trees are nearby i will eat the fruits and srubs to survive but never get through any non-veg food.
I'd eat you first.:-D
That's not really a credible question though,because I dont know of an island that have NO vegetation of any sympathetic on it.And if,strangely enough,within WAS an island like that,and I get stranded there,I would munch through seaweed!
as i vegatarian I would not go out to exterminate the fish to eat, but i am sure nearby would be enough Road Kill (or the deep kill ?) for me to survive
If that wasn't possble afterwards i would try and think of the most humane mode to ensure my survival, until I was contained by that position, I cannot say appendage on heart that i would not eat the fish. Fair play to anyone that say's they wouldn't, not sure I could be that strong.
ego die of food poisoning because i cant cook fish
i dont know what id do
i'd starve.
we've be asked this question past, and I've been call a moran for my answer before. So, i'm up for it, let have it!!
Its a shame population don't understand that morals can be so strong.
Its also a shame that some nation here can't read a dictionary. A vegetarian does not munch through meat, FISH, poultry or slaughter by-products. Do you agree, Caz, Becky and Sara ?
I notice you adjectives have lots of thumbs down, does that not narrate you something ?
simple really.
I'de eat sea-weed.
I'm not sure. I abhorrence fish. Not sure if it would be worth it...
Plus, you'd more than likely die anyway...
A desert island? I never hear of one of those. I have hear of a deserted island which just vehicle unoccupied. Nobody can answer a question resembling this when the facts just don't exist. BUT, if it come to starving or intake, of course I would drink fish.
eat the fish obviously!
I would quite cheerily eat my course through a person to survive. But as it is presently i can vegetarian gratefulness
I would die!
coz i would starve
Gregs reply is great. If there be no fresh water on the island what is the point of drinking fish? You need dampen to survive. Fish cant keep you alive for a greatly long time, especially in hot weather.
If nearby was fresh hose available, then adjectives kinds of plants would grow nearby. In that case why would I want to devour the fish, when I could have mangos, bananas, coconut milk etc...
I wouldn't be capable of catch the fish :( Looks resembling I won't be surviving that one then.
I'm not defiant eating meat. I'm anti most of the methods used to raise and slaughter the meat specifically readily available to me. Even the meat considered free-range or organic is written off as as such under tremendously ambiguous standards, which I don't trust. If it was a thing of survival, and I was intuitively able to exterminate the fish humanely, I woul have no problem ingestion it.
Also, re: other replies, someone who eats fish is NOT a lacto-vegetarian. Fish is meat, it was once a living animal, and near is no such thing as a lacto-vegetarian who eats meat.
More Questions & Answers...
i'd proberly arrest & eat the fish.
Answers:
That's a darn perfect question.
Seriously, I reflect it's a great pity, or perhaps in reality a crime, that our society is so rich that some of its members have a feeling they can allow temselves the luxury of of having moral ambience about what they guzzle. Too many of the world's relatives are really on that island only within isn't any fish either..
bass
hmmmm....?errrrrrrrr?wow! that's easier said than done to say!! oh..okay,what the hell LET'S EAT!
a lot of veggies actualy put away fish!
They'd eat leaves and sand I suppose:(
Hey presently, I'm a vegan, beside the exception of beef. I would definatly say no to the fish. I deliberate it would be immoral.
Not adjectives veg'ies refuse to guzzle fish. however you forgot to mention the vegitation. Veg'ies and vegans as well as Normal Healthy Diet eater could also chomp through roots, shrubs etc..
You would have to guzzle it to survive, dont think you would stop it and kill it within the first place if you had no intention of drinking it. People do anything to survive, weve all group storys of humans eating respectively other and drinking urine to survive, so im sure you could manage the uncommon fish to survive..
no i would eat my arms consequently legs,then your cranium.
That's like asking if you be stuck in prison for existence would you become sexually involved with relations of your same sex?
What purpose do people's random opinion provide to your hypothetical question? Life isn't hypothetical..so don't try it.
Show me an island that have no plant life on it and we >may< verbs this conversation.
I don't think it's possible for an island to hold no plant life. Anyway if here really was such a hypothetical island, even if I be to catch fish, I will still die since we can't survive on fish alone: so it's die very soon or die later. I a bit focus my energies on how to get out of that island.
too unpromising dude, but I'm a vegetarian who does guzzle fish and haven't gone vegan however. still, i always said that if i have to spear my own fish/slaughter my own chicken i would just starve, so i would in recent times commit suicide at that point. i probably would die anyways from not preparing the fish right.
Well, we know that humans are not carnivores but that at times our early ancestors probably did rely on flesh when their survival depended on it (although they would not hold tried to subsist on flesh or animal products all the time because that unnatural diet for an herbivore would mete out disease...um, like we own prevalent today!). So, yes, most people would consume flesh to some extent than die. This does not compromise morals. Eating to survive does not equate to the uneccessary and unhealthy flesh consumption that goes on surrounded by today's world.
This is the kind of request for information schoolkids ask.I am never going to be in this situation!If you insist I answer though:
If near was no fresh marine eating fish wouldn't minister to and I'd die anyway.If there be fresh water consequently odds are at hand would be edible plants to get through.Either way I'd depart the fish alone.
Oh and if we did end up within this situation you wouldn't last much longer than me-you can't survive for long on nil but fish,there are profoundly of nutrients that aren't in fish.
I would chomp through it but at least take out it humanely!
I am pescaterian, meaning lacto-vegetarian but I eat fish, so yeah! I would much prefer if I could capture my own fish. I figure the root of this put somebody through the mill has to do near morals as to how deep vegetarianism surrounded by people go. my diet is chosen due to my belief that it is the healthiest for me, no impositions on others. A big section of my diet choices have to do near eating as localy as possible, and catching your own fish can't procure more local! And the fish were completely free, ingestion their natural diet, not feed who knows what on a fruit farm, which is even better.
Starve. God would give me bread to guzzle and water to drink.
how can one drink fish in desert,their is no river to drink in desert and you are dictum to eat fish.haha :)
i will die but not get through non-veg,will drink water and survive if trees are nearby i will eat the fruits and srubs to survive but never get through any non-veg food.
I'd eat you first.:-D
That's not really a credible question though,because I dont know of an island that have NO vegetation of any sympathetic on it.And if,strangely enough,within WAS an island like that,and I get stranded there,I would munch through seaweed!
as i vegatarian I would not go out to exterminate the fish to eat, but i am sure nearby would be enough Road Kill (or the deep kill ?) for me to survive
If that wasn't possble afterwards i would try and think of the most humane mode to ensure my survival, until I was contained by that position, I cannot say appendage on heart that i would not eat the fish. Fair play to anyone that say's they wouldn't, not sure I could be that strong.
ego die of food poisoning because i cant cook fish
i dont know what id do
i'd starve.
we've be asked this question past, and I've been call a moran for my answer before. So, i'm up for it, let have it!!
Its a shame population don't understand that morals can be so strong.
Its also a shame that some nation here can't read a dictionary. A vegetarian does not munch through meat, FISH, poultry or slaughter by-products. Do you agree, Caz, Becky and Sara ?
I notice you adjectives have lots of thumbs down, does that not narrate you something ?
simple really.
I'de eat sea-weed.
I'm not sure. I abhorrence fish. Not sure if it would be worth it...
Plus, you'd more than likely die anyway...
A desert island? I never hear of one of those. I have hear of a deserted island which just vehicle unoccupied. Nobody can answer a question resembling this when the facts just don't exist. BUT, if it come to starving or intake, of course I would drink fish.
eat the fish obviously!
I would quite cheerily eat my course through a person to survive. But as it is presently i can vegetarian gratefulness
I would die!
coz i would starve
Gregs reply is great. If there be no fresh water on the island what is the point of drinking fish? You need dampen to survive. Fish cant keep you alive for a greatly long time, especially in hot weather.
If nearby was fresh hose available, then adjectives kinds of plants would grow nearby. In that case why would I want to devour the fish, when I could have mangos, bananas, coconut milk etc...
I wouldn't be capable of catch the fish :( Looks resembling I won't be surviving that one then.
I'm not defiant eating meat. I'm anti most of the methods used to raise and slaughter the meat specifically readily available to me. Even the meat considered free-range or organic is written off as as such under tremendously ambiguous standards, which I don't trust. If it was a thing of survival, and I was intuitively able to exterminate the fish humanely, I woul have no problem ingestion it.
Also, re: other replies, someone who eats fish is NOT a lacto-vegetarian. Fish is meat, it was once a living animal, and near is no such thing as a lacto-vegetarian who eats meat.
More Questions & Answers...