I've always wondered the point of animal trialling...won't animals have different reaction then humans do to products? Is at hand an alternative to animal testing?
Answers:
Exactly we enjoy totally differnt biology systems to animal so what is the point just because a cure doesnt work on mice does not penny-pinching it wont work on humans and alternatively we could of thrown away hundreds of cures because they didnt work on animals, We could of cured cancer years ago. and the abuse the animals stir through even the ones that promise high animal welfare hold been reported for animal knock about it is absolutely sick. I totally disagree next to it. why must we abuse these animals? merely because they cant fight rear and talk we construe they are less superior than ourselves which is not true it newly males us barbaric. we need to renovation this.
oh, i thought you said animal tasting. i muse alot of them taste biddable, if you want to know
Yes. You can personally do your bit for animal rights by volunteering to take the place of an animal contained by a clinical drug study. Go on, do it. You'll feel better in the order of yourself. Really.
Why! Why does all the crap we consume enjoy to be tested on animals first? A rabbit doesn't need lipstick! A Rabbit doesn't use quill spray! A monkey doesn't need pills to return with revved up for hot, monkey sex! It's people man, we're miserable!
As a regular meat eater and standard omnivore I still feel that certian product conducting tests is very wrong and should be stopped. I realize that some medical testing on animals is vital though I might not like it within some cases there is no other opening. Cosmetics on the other hand.no animal should be put through carrying out tests for the sake of vanity.
The alternitive to animal conducting tests is testing on us. Animal trialling is used in of late about everything. if it don't hurt the animal afterwards it probably won't hurt us. It is used in carrying out tests for cancer, diabietes, aids, ect. If it wasn't for animals the organ transplant programs wouldn't exisit nor would your shampoo or makeup. Animal testing is needed to relief us defeat these dieseses and support us in our afternoon to day enthusiasm. If you don't agree then propose up yourself for testing, it would collect the animals that are bred to do this.
-At least 50 drugs on the open market cause cancer within laboratory animals. They are allowed because it is admitted the animal test are not relevant.
-Less than 2% of human illnesses (1.16%) are ever seen surrounded by animals.
-When asked if they agreed that animal experiments can be misleading 'because of anatomical and physiological differences between animals and humans', 88% of doctors agreed.
-Up to 90% of animal test results are discarded as they are inapplicable to man
-Lemon liquid is a deadly poison, but arsenic, hemlock and botulin are nontoxic according to animal tests.
http://vivisection-absurd.org.uk/menun.h...
You are categorically right-the animals react totally different to the products that are tested on them!
And not individual that, but in most cases, even when the animal have a negative spontaneous effect, they STILL will mass produce the product for human use and consumption!!
Some companies have used humans to check their products on, because after all, won't the products be used by humans surrounded by the end?
But those companies that create pure products do not use animal testing.
you're undeniably right. animals and people aren't indistinguishable biologically.
There is a wealth of investigative methods that produce results accurately, competently and at less cost than animal research. Some of these methods hold been used successfully for centuries, such as autopsy studies, clinical inspection and epidemiology (the study of the incidence of disease within segment of the human population). New technologies, such as computer simulations, numerical modeling, in vitro research and diagnostic imaging also own the potential to replace animal research.
here's some animal testing quotes that I approaching:
"If we cut up beasts simply because they cannot prevent us and because we are aid our own side in the struggle for existence, it is single logical to cut up imbeciles, criminals, enemies, or capitalist for indistinguishable reasons." ~C. S. Lewis
"...we sacrifice other species to our own not because our own have any objective metaphysical privilege over others, but simply because it is ours. It may be enormously natural to hold this loyalty to our own species, but let us hear no more from the naturalists more or less the "sentimentality" of anti-vivisectionists. If loyalty to our own species--preference for man simply because we are men--is not sentiment, then what is?" ~C. S. LEwis
"Atrocities are not smaller number atrocities when they occur within laboratories and are call medical research."~George Bernard Shaw
"Every year tens of thousands of animals suffer and die contained by laboratory tests of cosmetics and household products...despite the certainty that the test results do not facilitate prevent or treat accidental or purposeful misuse of the products. Please mix me in using your voice for those whose cries are forever hermetic behind the laboratory doors." ~ Woody Harrelson
"I abhor vivisection. It should at lowest be curbed. Better, it should be abolished. I know of no feat through vivisection, no scientific discovery, that could not own been obtain without such barbarism and cruelty. The intact thing is evil." ~ Dr. Charles W. Mayo
"I am not interested to know whether vivisection produces results that are profitable to the human see or doesn't...The pain which it inflicts upon unconsenting animals is the cause of my enmity toward it, and it is to me sufficient justification of the enmity short looking further." ~ Mark Twain
Vivisection(animal testing) is cruel, pointless, and unnecessary. I don't see why they continue practicing it. If you want to relief stop the needless brutality, after try to quit purchasing from products who experiment on defenseless animals. Proctor & Gamble is an example of this...you might want to google search what other products are tested on animals...I can't right very soon because my computer's being stupid...sorry. I would furnish you a list if I could...ably I gotta go...bye and devout luck living cruelty-free if you don't already. oh and thanks for civilized.
Not really an answer but just to travel more with your ask: When you get a pesky cold, you don't try to turn to your dog's vet, right? Everyone would think you be crazy. That's because animals are very different from us—though we are similar within one very meaningful way: We share duplicate ability to suffer and get the impression pain. So how within the world did some wacko come up with the thought of sticking animals in stressful, unnatural conditions, forcing them to be sick, and consequently cutting up their bodies to try to possibly, possibly, somewhere down the line lend a hand people?! It make no sense—no sense at all!
http://www.peta.com/actioncenter/testing...
Volunteer and they can start using humans
More Questions & Answers...
Answers:
Exactly we enjoy totally differnt biology systems to animal so what is the point just because a cure doesnt work on mice does not penny-pinching it wont work on humans and alternatively we could of thrown away hundreds of cures because they didnt work on animals, We could of cured cancer years ago. and the abuse the animals stir through even the ones that promise high animal welfare hold been reported for animal knock about it is absolutely sick. I totally disagree next to it. why must we abuse these animals? merely because they cant fight rear and talk we construe they are less superior than ourselves which is not true it newly males us barbaric. we need to renovation this.
oh, i thought you said animal tasting. i muse alot of them taste biddable, if you want to know
Yes. You can personally do your bit for animal rights by volunteering to take the place of an animal contained by a clinical drug study. Go on, do it. You'll feel better in the order of yourself. Really.
Why! Why does all the crap we consume enjoy to be tested on animals first? A rabbit doesn't need lipstick! A Rabbit doesn't use quill spray! A monkey doesn't need pills to return with revved up for hot, monkey sex! It's people man, we're miserable!
As a regular meat eater and standard omnivore I still feel that certian product conducting tests is very wrong and should be stopped. I realize that some medical testing on animals is vital though I might not like it within some cases there is no other opening. Cosmetics on the other hand.no animal should be put through carrying out tests for the sake of vanity.
The alternitive to animal conducting tests is testing on us. Animal trialling is used in of late about everything. if it don't hurt the animal afterwards it probably won't hurt us. It is used in carrying out tests for cancer, diabietes, aids, ect. If it wasn't for animals the organ transplant programs wouldn't exisit nor would your shampoo or makeup. Animal testing is needed to relief us defeat these dieseses and support us in our afternoon to day enthusiasm. If you don't agree then propose up yourself for testing, it would collect the animals that are bred to do this.
-At least 50 drugs on the open market cause cancer within laboratory animals. They are allowed because it is admitted the animal test are not relevant.
-Less than 2% of human illnesses (1.16%) are ever seen surrounded by animals.
-When asked if they agreed that animal experiments can be misleading 'because of anatomical and physiological differences between animals and humans', 88% of doctors agreed.
-Up to 90% of animal test results are discarded as they are inapplicable to man
-Lemon liquid is a deadly poison, but arsenic, hemlock and botulin are nontoxic according to animal tests.
http://vivisection-absurd.org.uk/menun.h...
You are categorically right-the animals react totally different to the products that are tested on them!
And not individual that, but in most cases, even when the animal have a negative spontaneous effect, they STILL will mass produce the product for human use and consumption!!
Some companies have used humans to check their products on, because after all, won't the products be used by humans surrounded by the end?
But those companies that create pure products do not use animal testing.
you're undeniably right. animals and people aren't indistinguishable biologically.
There is a wealth of investigative methods that produce results accurately, competently and at less cost than animal research. Some of these methods hold been used successfully for centuries, such as autopsy studies, clinical inspection and epidemiology (the study of the incidence of disease within segment of the human population). New technologies, such as computer simulations, numerical modeling, in vitro research and diagnostic imaging also own the potential to replace animal research.
here's some animal testing quotes that I approaching:
"If we cut up beasts simply because they cannot prevent us and because we are aid our own side in the struggle for existence, it is single logical to cut up imbeciles, criminals, enemies, or capitalist for indistinguishable reasons." ~C. S. Lewis
"...we sacrifice other species to our own not because our own have any objective metaphysical privilege over others, but simply because it is ours. It may be enormously natural to hold this loyalty to our own species, but let us hear no more from the naturalists more or less the "sentimentality" of anti-vivisectionists. If loyalty to our own species--preference for man simply because we are men--is not sentiment, then what is?" ~C. S. LEwis
"Atrocities are not smaller number atrocities when they occur within laboratories and are call medical research."~George Bernard Shaw
"Every year tens of thousands of animals suffer and die contained by laboratory tests of cosmetics and household products...despite the certainty that the test results do not facilitate prevent or treat accidental or purposeful misuse of the products. Please mix me in using your voice for those whose cries are forever hermetic behind the laboratory doors." ~ Woody Harrelson
"I abhor vivisection. It should at lowest be curbed. Better, it should be abolished. I know of no feat through vivisection, no scientific discovery, that could not own been obtain without such barbarism and cruelty. The intact thing is evil." ~ Dr. Charles W. Mayo
"I am not interested to know whether vivisection produces results that are profitable to the human see or doesn't...The pain which it inflicts upon unconsenting animals is the cause of my enmity toward it, and it is to me sufficient justification of the enmity short looking further." ~ Mark Twain
Vivisection(animal testing) is cruel, pointless, and unnecessary. I don't see why they continue practicing it. If you want to relief stop the needless brutality, after try to quit purchasing from products who experiment on defenseless animals. Proctor & Gamble is an example of this...you might want to google search what other products are tested on animals...I can't right very soon because my computer's being stupid...sorry. I would furnish you a list if I could...ably I gotta go...bye and devout luck living cruelty-free if you don't already. oh and thanks for civilized.
Not really an answer but just to travel more with your ask: When you get a pesky cold, you don't try to turn to your dog's vet, right? Everyone would think you be crazy. That's because animals are very different from us—though we are similar within one very meaningful way: We share duplicate ability to suffer and get the impression pain. So how within the world did some wacko come up with the thought of sticking animals in stressful, unnatural conditions, forcing them to be sick, and consequently cutting up their bodies to try to possibly, possibly, somewhere down the line lend a hand people?! It make no sense—no sense at all!
http://www.peta.com/actioncenter/testing...
Volunteer and they can start using humans
More Questions & Answers...