Answer:
That's someone just only just gave up meat and they are trying vegetarianism. They are a newbie lacto-vegetarian. They don't know everything about vegetarianism.. a trainee.
They haven't made an absolute eradication of meat. They may go put a bet on to being a meat eater if they opt they don't like self a vegetarian!
Someone with commitment issues.
there is no such article. If you eat meat, poulty or fish, you are not a vegatarian. If you devour no meat or poultry, but do eat fish, you are a pescavore. If you drink NO meat, poultry or fish, you are a vegetarian. If you use NO products from animals, including leather, wool, or cosmetics tested on animals, you are a lacto-vegetarian. There is no such thing as borderline. You any are, or you arent. Vegetarians take this lifestyle too seriously to enjoy it done half @ssed
It's a term made up by someone pretending to be a lacto-vegetarian.
An omnivore posturing.
They should strictly say 'I drink a mainly lacto-vegetarian diet but will still eat meat and am as a consequence not a vegetarian' but that is comparatively a mouthful to say. Maybe they should enunciate flexavore or infrequent meat eater!! Greenghost is our resident expert here though, his opinion is worth a shot!
they kind of do and mode of don't eat meat .... explicitly what it means to a lacto-vegetarian......
plentifully of people dream up they are a vegetarian if they don't put away red meat---wrong
That it not a permanent status which means anything and no.
what a great question, i guess borderline lacto-vegetarian is food that is not really lacto-vegetarian food but passed off as lacto-vegetarian food, so yea
no man, vegetarians don't guzzle meat, and a person who eat meat and vegg is not a vegetarian
From my experience.... "borderline vegetarian" is a term used by general public to describe themselves when "they don't eat much meat." Which is certainly no where in the neighbourhood a vegetarian... but they similar to to think so. :)
On a side-note... My mother-in-law once told me at dinner, knowing that I be a vegetarian, that her prime dish "only have a little chicken contained by it". A "borderline vegetarian" would have eat it.
i do believe it is someone who simply will eat white meat or of late read meat or just poltry or perchance just fish primarily it is someone who will only get through one kind of meat which is not a vegitarian
I think Andie is trying to sort me mad by pointing this sound out out to me by talking aft my back<VBG>. She *did* but not in the course she intended (I think)...
Before I kick-start my flamethrower I'll say that this is a occupancy I've never heard up to that time and I would compare it to being borderline pregnant. I reflect both Andrew and Goody2shoes are on the right track<g>. The *only* way I could adopt this term is from someone that be considering changing to a lacto-vegetarian lifestyle and *only* for a relatively short time period whilst they be learning how to live near a kinder diet. I don't think I would adopt much in the passageway of meat-ish items if they're trying to become a veggie. Patdchick19, if you're interested in becoming veggie here's some links that will minister to you out. I'm not personally thrilled beside the last two but you will find them adjectives.
http://www.ivu.org/
http://www.ivu.org/faq/index.html...
http://www.allinfoaboutvegetarianism.com...
http://www.goveg.com
What made me mad is that I only just saw the most hypocritical answer I have ever see! The total GALL of the person totally astonishes me!! I have to leave the answer box unfold and staring at me for two hours before I calmed down adequate to turn my flamethrower down to low.
"There is no such thing as borderline. You any are, or you arent."
To see this line coming from that source is chutzpa at it's finest!! It's also dismal; really, *really* sad the opening you pretend outrage when you are at best one of the people that so abundant other answerers spoke of.
More Questions & Answers...